Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Archives Before June 2016 Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login

A Review « Previous Article ToC Next Article »
Neutral Zone : Rationale, Concept, Merits And Demerits Of Special Techniques 
Sharad Vaidya 1 , Archana Nagpal 2 , Rajeev Gupta 3 , Rupandeep Kaur Samra 4




Address For Correspondence
Dr. Sharad Vaidya, Senior Lecturer
Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology
Himachal Dental College
Sundernagar, Himachal Pradesh 

    Abstract
The goal of dentistry is to keep teeth in a healthy state. If the teeth are lost despite all efforts to save them, re-establishment should be made such that teeth function efficiently and comfortably in harmony with muscles of the stomatognathic system and temporomandibular joints (TMJ). One of the most common problems encountered among long term denture wearers is the diminution in the denture foundation area. Rehabilitation of a patient with severely resorbed ridge is a challenging therapy a prosthodontist can undertake. In order to ensure a favorable prognosis, the impression technique, impression material and tooth moulds selected should be based on the present state of the basal tissue support. This article discusses the concept, muscles involved, technique, advantages and indications of neutral zone technique to achieve stability in highly resorbed mandibular edentulous ridge and also an insight into the rationale of using these techniques.

     Keywords
Neutral Zone, Stability, Resorbed Ridges

  Full Text

Introduction:
The fabrication of complete removable dentures has evolved noticeably over the last 20 years with the advent of new materials and a better understanding of patient’s expectations. There is a general agreement about one aspect of complete denture treatment i.e. an accurate impression of the edentulous alveolar ridges and adjacent functional structures must be obtained before proceeding to fabricate the complete dentures. Without this foundation, there is no hope of providing patients with idyllic function, comfort, and aesthetics. The lower denture commonly presents the most difficulties with pain and sloppiness being the most common complaint, because the mandible atrophies at a greater rate than the maxilla and has less residual ridge for retention and support.[1],[2],[3],[4] Looseness and discomfort are the most frequent complaints reported by patients and they are quite often difficult to manage by dentists. Neuromuscular control is said to be the key determinant in stability of lower complete denture as the area available for support is far less than maxillary support area.[5]
Throughout time, many theories emerged to illustrate where prosthetic teeth of denture should be positioned. These approaches have been challenged from time to time and found insufficient in patients with severely atrophic mandibular ridges and patients with enlarged tongue. To beat such problems, the neutral zone technique was advocated.[4],[6],[7] The neutral zone is the zone of minimal conflict, zone of equilibrium, potential denture space and the dead space area where forces generated in an outward direction from the tongue are being neutralized or balanced by the inward forces generated by lips and cheeks during functional activities. Setting teeth and contouring polished surface of lower CD within this zone adds more to stability.[5] The neutral zone technique is most effective for patients who have had numerous unstable, unretentive lower complete dentures.[1],[8],[9] This article discusses the concept, muscles involved, technique and indications of neutral zone to achieve stability in highly resorbed mandibular edentulous ridge and also an insight into the rationale of using this technique.

Various Concepts Regarding Arrangement Of Posterior Teeth (Table I). [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [35], [36], [37], [38]
Regardless of the fabrication technique used, functionally inappropriate denture tooth arrangement or physiologically unacceptable denture base volume or contour have been implicated in poor prosthesis stability and retention of the denture. Neutrocentric concept by Devan has been used practically to enhance this stability. This concept states that posterior mandibular denture teeth are arranged to occupy as central a location as possible, relative to the denture foundation, without disturbing adequate tongue function. This tooth arrangement is said to facilitate mandibular denture stability during occlusal loading. Various concepts have been suggested about the arrangement of posterior denture teeth.[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]

[Image 1]


Neutral zone is that region where forces imposed by the tongue directed outward are neutralized by inwardly directed forces originating from the cheeks and lips during normal neuromuscular function. In general, boundary conditions that define the neutral zone are developed through muscular contraction and relaxation during the various functions of mastication, phonation, deglutition, and facial expression. These neuromuscular forces vary in magnitude and direction in different areas of the oral cavity, in different individuals, and at different periods of life. The trajectory of force applications to prosthetic surfaces will either serve to stabilize or dislodge the complete dentures. [15], [16], [17], [18], [21], [22], [24], [25]

Muscles Invcolved In Neutral Zone (Table II)  [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]

The musculature of the denture space cam be divided into two groups (Fig 1)
-    Dislocating Muscles: Muscles primarily involved in dislocating denture during activity.
-    Fixing Muscles: Muscles that fix the denture by muscular pressure on the polished surface.
These can be further divided according to their location on the vestibular (labial & buccal) side or lingual side of the dentures.

[Image 2]

[Image 3]



Rationale  [18], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]
Increased access to dental care has led to patients losing their teeth at a later stage of life. Compounded by increased life expectancy, this has led to the majority of complete denture wearers to be elderly and has increased the proportion of those who have poor neuromuscular control, poor adaptive capacity and severely atrophic ridges. The rationale of Neutral Zone is: To fabricate a lower complete denture that is optimally situated and in harmony with the structures and forces discussed above. By doing so, these forces are more likely to be stabilizing rather than unseating.

Indications and Materials (Table III)  [29], [30], [31], [32]
In general, neutral zone technique is indicated when stability and patient’s acceptance of lower complete denture are in question. This technique is found to be used in the following clinical situations:

[Image 4]


•    Severely atrophic mandibular ridge
•    Patients with prominent and highly attached mentalis muscle, lateral spreading of tongue as a result of poor transition from dentate to edentulous state and severe resorption.
•    Patients with diminished neuromuscular control such as those with a history of stroke, Parkinson’s disease or patients with impaired motor innervation to oral and facial muscles.
•    Patients with atypical shape or consistency of oral and perioral structures. Patients with scleroderma or patients who have undergone marginal or segmental mandi bulectomy are also candidates for this technique.
•    This technique can be used to locate optimal position for implants in cases of implant-supported or retained overdentures, which enhances the overall outcome of treatment.

Technique [5],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]
1.    Primary impression is made in stock tray with alginate hydrocolloid material/impression compound.
2.    Impression is poured in dental plaster and special tray is fabricated with spacer (Fig 2).
3.    Extensions of the special tray are checked intra-orally. A secondary impression is made with polyvinyl silicone impression material.
4.    Master cast is obtained. Heat cure denture base is fabricated over it.
5.    Wax block is added to the base plate and occlusal registration is made in the conventional manner.
6.    Maxillary cast is mounted on semi-adjustable articulator using face bow transfer. Centric registration and mounting of lower cast. This is from here that techniques to record neutral zone vary.
    a)    By use of tissue conditioning agent: Mandibular wax block is removed and replaced by wire loops attached to acrylic denture base (Fig 3). These are carefully positioned within the contours of the wax block and conformed to the same vertical dimension of occlusion. Tissue conditioning material is applied to the wire loops and placed inside mouth. (Fig 4). Patient is instructed to carry out simple oral movements – swallowing, chewing, puffing of lips and sipping water. (Fig 5). These movements will help to shape tissue conditioning material to the contours of neutral zone.
    b)    Neutral zone can also be recoded using “ADMIX” technique.[49] Wax block is removed from the mandibular base and is replaced with admix compound (7 parts of green stick compound and 3 parts of red compound). This material removes any folds on the edentulous tissue and its increased flow helps in recording neutral zone effectively (Fig 6). Compound rim is conformed to the established vertical dimension. Place the completed record base and recording rim in the water bath (1400 F for approximately 2 minutes in preparation for the clinical procedure. Remove the base and rim from the water bath and quickly place it intra-orally. Instruct the patient to swallow. Next, provide a cup of warm water to the patient and instruct the patient to sip and swallow. Have the patient repeat this sip and swallow exercise several times. When the neutral zone record has cooled and hardened, remove and inspect the record for accuracy and completeness. If necessary, repeat the procedure to ensure proper recording of the entire neutral zone. Eliminate excess impression compound that has been displaced superior to the intended occlusal plane during the recording procedure and, if necessary, repeat the recording process, beginning with warm water bath.
7.    To develop the facial and lingual neutral zone index, seat the neutral zone record on the mandibular definitive cast. Prepare laboratory putty (Poly V Putty; Accurate Set, Inc, Newark, NJ) to a workable consistency and adapt it into the tongue space and buccal surface of the neutral zone record (Fig 7). Mould the putty so that it: (a) completely fills the tongue space; (b) adapts accurately to the lingual contours of the neutral zone record; (c) is level with the occlusal plane of the record; and (d) extends over the posterior land area of the cast. Teeth arrangement is done within the confines of the index without of any consideration to achieve balance (Fig 6, 8).

[Image 5]

[Image 6]

[Image 7]

[Image 8]

[Image 9]

[Image 10]

[Image 11]


Discussion:
The ultimate aim of the prosthodontist is to restore form, function and esthetics. Many approaches to set teeth have been advocated and used in complete denture treatment. However, there is substantial debate on which of these provide optimal position in the facio-lingual dimension and guarantee a favourable outcome in terms of stability, facial support, chewing efficiency, aesthetics and patient comfort. Some authors have defined biometric measurements and location of relatively stable anatomical landmarks to set teeth; whereas, some relied on difference in resorption patterns to set denture teeth where their natural predecessors were thought to have been. Some authors adopted a mechanical concept and advocated setting teeth directly in the centre of denture support area where the least amount of leverage is present which in turn enhances the stability of lower denture. [1],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[43],[44],[46],[47] All of these approaches were and are still being used and each of them proved to have advantages and disadvantages when compared to others. It has been found that neutral zone is closely related to the crest of residual ridge in patients who have been edentulous for less than two years and significantly differs in those who were edentulous for a period more than that.[5] The neutral zone approach registers the neutral zone to determine the proper placement of teeth after resorption has taken place.[2] Denture fabricated over a severely resorbed mandibular ridge by neutral zone impression technique ensures that the muscular forces aid in the retention and stabilization of the denture rather than dislodging the denture during function. The dentures will also have other advantages such as reduced food lodgment, good esthetics due to facial support, proper positioning of the posterior teeth which allows sufficient tongue space.[38],[39],[40]
This technique has been criticized based on claims that it is supported by practical evidence. However, other authors maintain that NZ technique is inaccurate based on significant clinical observations on the role of destabilizing forces the muscles apply to CDs during functional movements. Furthermore, the large number of case reports accumulated in a short period of time and clinical studies conducted by Stromberg & Hicke and Fahmy & Kharat add to the validity of this technique.[41],[42],[43],[44]
The principle of the neutral zone concept has remained the same since it has been first described by Beresin and Schiesser.[50] However; this technique has been subjected to various modifications. Type of retention incorporated in the baseplate (acrylic pillars or wire loops), recording materials used and further refinement to the initial record are among the variations between clinicians. Mostly the preference is to use combination of thin acrylic pillars in premolar region connected by a wire loop which maintains the VDO and provides maximum retention at the same time as explained earlier in this article. [45],[46],[47],[48]
The neutral zone philosophy is based on the concept that in each patient there is a zone of neutrality that helps to keep denture in place without displacement. In patients with extreme resorption of the alveolar ridges, it becomes necessary to record this position for long term success of the denture.

Conclusion:
NZ concept is considered as exceptionally important when considering treatment options for patients complaining from unstable lower CD predominantly if implant treatment is not feasible. It aims to place lower CD where forces generated by lips, cheeks and tongue have a stabilizing rather than dislodging effect. With improvement in dental material science and development of newer techniques in prosthodontics, the neutral zone impression technique may be incorporated into fabrication of any complete denture.

References
1.    Zinner ID, Sherman H. An analysis of the development of complete denture impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46: 242-249.
2.    Kois JC, Fan PP. Complete denture impression technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;18 : 699-708.
3.    Utz KH. Studies of changes in occlusion after the insertion of complete dentures (part II). J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24: 376-384.
4.    Drago CJ. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 2003; 12 : 192-197.
5.    Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 152-157.
6.    Young L, Johnson C. Adjusting complete denture occlusion with an intraoral balancer. Compendium. 1987; 8: 54-58.
7.    Massad JJ. A metal-based denture with soft liner to accommodate the severely resorbed mandibular alveolar ridge. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 707-711.
8.    Muller J, Gotz G, Bruckner G. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65: 43-50.
9.    Shipmon TH, Massad JJ. Optimum dentures, part 1: the need for patient management. Dent Today. 1993; 12(8): 84-89.
10.    Massad JJ, Shipmon TH Sr. Optimum dentures, part 2: patient evaluation for success. Dent Today. 1993; 12(9): 82-87.
11.    Massad JJ, Shipmon TH Sr. Optimum dentures, part 3: internal and external impressions. Dent Today. 1993;12(10):46-51.
12.    Massad JJ, Shipmon TH Sr. Optimum dentures, part 4: a perspective on vertical and centric relationships. Dent Today. 1994;13(1):42-45.
13.    Utz KH, Muller F, Bernard N, et al. Comparative studies on check-bite and central-bearing-point method for the remounting of complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:717-726.
14.    Massad JJ. Denture retention: neutral zone utilization. Independent Dentistry. 1998;3:44-52.
15.    Salinas TJ. Contemporary materials for removable prosthodontics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999;11:888.
16.    Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:224-227.
17.    Hyde TP, McCord JF. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general denture practice in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:295-299.
18.    Soni A. Use of loose fitting copper bands over extremely mobile teeth while making impressions for immediate dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:638-639.
19.    Bissasu M. Use of lingual frenum in determining the original vertical position of mandibular anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:177-181.
20.    Massad JJ, Connelly ME. A simplified approach to optimizing denture stability with lingualized occlusion. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:555-570.
21.    Cheng AC, Wee AG, Shiu-Yin C, et al. Prosthodontic management of limited oral access after ablative tumor surgery: a clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:269-273.
22.    AbuJamra NF, Stavridakis MM, Miller RB. Evaluation of interarch space for implant restorations in edentulous patients: a laboratory technique. J Prosthodont. 2000;9:102-105.
23.    Ockert-Eriksson G, Eriksson A, Lockowandt P, et al. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:152-158.
24.    Alfano SG, Leupold RJ. Using the neutral zone to obtain maxillomandibular relationship records for complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:621-623.
25.    Karkazis HC. Prosthodontic management of a patient with neurological disorders after resection of an acoustic neurinoma: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:419-422.
26.    Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P, et al. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods. Br Dent J. 2002;192:395-400.
27.    Koshino H, Hirai T, Ishijima T, et al. Influence of mandibular residual ridge shape on masticatory efficiency in complete denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:295-298.
28.    Rignon-Bret C, Dupuis R, Gaudy JF. Application of a 3-dimensional measurement system to complete denture impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:603-612.
29.    Hayakawa I, Watanabe I. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:177-180.
30.    Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Current concepts and techniques in complete denture final impression procedures. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:280-287.
31.    Ling BC. A three-visit, complete-denture technique utilizing visible light-cured resin for tray and base plate construction. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:294-298.
32.    Weinberg L. Tooth position in relation to the denture base foundation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1958;8(3):398-405.
33.    Payne A. Factors influencing the position of artificial upper anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1971;26(1):26-32.
34.    Murray C. Re-establishing natural tooth position in the endentulous environment. Australian Dental Journal. 1978;23(5):415.
35.    Watt DM. Tooth positions on complete dentures. J Dent. 1978;6(2):147-60.
36.    Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36(4):356-67.
37.    Fahmi F. The position of the neutral zone in relation to the alveolar ridge. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67(6):805-9.
38.    Lammie GA. Aging changes in the complete lower denture. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:450-64.
39.    Lott F, Levin B. Flange technique, an anatomic and physiologic approach to increased retention, function, comfort, and appearance of denture. J Prosthet Dent 1996;16:394-413.
40.    Gahan Mj, Walmsley Ad. The Neutral Zone Impression Revisited. Br Dent J. 2005;198(5):269-72.
41.    C.D Lynch Pfa. Overcoming the Unstable Mandibular Complete Denture: The Neutral Zone Impression Technique. Dental Update. 2006;33:21-6.
42.    Miller Wp, Monteith B, Heath Mr. The Effect of Variation of The Lingual Shape of Mandibular Complete Dentures on Lingual Resistance to Lifting Forces. Gerodontology. 1998;15(2):113-9.
43.    Allen Pf, Wilson Nhf. Teeth for Life for Older Adults. Quintessence;2002.
44.    F.M F. The Position of the Neutral Zone in Relation to the Alveolar Ridge. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67(6):805-9.
45.    Raja Hz Sm. Relationship of Neutral Zone and Alveolar Ridge with Edentulous Period. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20(6):395-9.
46.    Memarian Lsfgsfam. Using Neutral Zone Concept in Prosthodontic Treatment of a Patient with Brain Surgery: A Clinical Report Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2011;55(2):117-20.
47.    Hina Z. Raja Mns. Neutral Zone Dentures Versus Conventional Dentures in Diverse Edentulous Periods Biomedic. 2009;25:136-45.
48.    Cagna Dr, Massad Jj, Schiesser Fj. The Neutral Zone Revisited: From Historical Concepts to Modern Application. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2009;101(6):405-12.
49.    McCord JF, Tyson KW. A conservative prosthodontic option for the treatment of edentulous patients with atrophic (flat) mandibular ridges. Br. Dent. J 1997; 182: 469 -472.
50.    BeresinVE, Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures-principles and technique, Reprint 1973, C.V. Mosby company

 

 


  « Previous Article ToC Next Article »